Sorority House Massacre
(1986)
Director:
Carol
Frank
Cast: Angela O'Neill, Wendy Martel, Pamela Ross
Once in a while, Roger Corman's New Horizons or Concorde
Pictures makes
a really good movie, like Cheyenne Warrior,
Confessions
of a Serial Killer, or Brain Dead. But
usually
we get movies like Sorority House Massacre
- cheap, unimaginative,
and badly made formula-driven productions. What makes this particular
film
more of a chore to watch than usual is that it comes from the slasher
genre,
which hasn't produced a lot of originality, or even rehashes filled
with
energy. Even the relatively easier ways a movie of this kind can please
the fans - blood, nudity - is woefully lacking. Especially the breasts,
both in quality and quantity.
The movie begins with the end - to be more specific, the
first thing
we see is a young university student named Beth in a hospital bed. An
older
woman comes into the room and asks her what happened. Beth replies, "It
must have all started when I entered the house...", which cues in a
flashback
that lasts for the rest of the movie. I've never liked it when any
movie,
slasher or otherwise, starts off with a character looking back at the
events
he or she just went through, consisting of the remainder of the movie.
The reason is obvious: we know that the character is going to survive
through
the ordeal, whatever it is. Since we know that Beth is going to survive
the title incident, there is no suspense concerning her character. So
the
only think possible we can feel about her character is a sense of
impatience,
knowing full well what her fate is going to be.
Back to the plot. In the flashback, Beth is invited to
the Theta Omega
Theta sorority for the weekend, so that the girls there can decide
whether
to take her on as a member. At the same time, across the city (wherever
this city is - there's no sense of which city or university this is),
some
guy locked in in an insane asylum seems to sense her entrance in the
house,
and starts making a large fuss. He is quickly strapped down in his bed
by the orderlies, who strap his wrists so loosely, he could easily pull
his arms free. Neverless, it takes him some time to free himself from
the
bed and the asylum, finally arriving at the sorority after more than
half
of the running time has gone by, but then he tries to make up for this
lost time by immediately going after everyone in and around the
sorority.
That's about it for plot. The script does try to build
in one of those
"twists" you usually find in this kind of film, giving us clues the way
by some dream sequences. These dream sequences are, at least at the
beginning,
not so bad, giving out a little eerie atmosphere. But they quickly
become
boring, with Beth in her dream walking from room to room, taking a long
time to do so. The twist, by the way, is so blatantly slapped in our
face
early on, Beth's unseeing of it time after time makes her look pretty
stupid.
The fact the movie runs only 75 minutes gives you a better clue that
we're
dealing with a pretty weak script. In another scene, one of the girls
says,
"Let's try on Cindy's clothes!", leading to a montage of the girls
wearing
various outfits and making various poses. It's quite a coincidence that
all these girls happen to be the same size as Cindy, for these outfits
fit perfectly. Of course, this scene is also an excuse to throw in some
nudity, but it's all a tease, quick flashes of nothing really
spectacular,
if you know what I mean.
The big nude scene actually comes from one of the four
jocks and nerds
that drop over just before the killer arrives. I didn't know whether to
laugh or cry when I saw a close-up of this guy, naked except for a pair
of shoes, running back to the sorority after his girlfriend is killed
in
their teepee. However, I did laugh after he ran into the sorority,
because
peeking out at the bottom of the screen you can see that he has
suddenly
grown a pair of underwear. Possibly the director didn't get the shot
framed
correctly; if so, this scene then becomes just another example of the
incompetence
of the direction. Though some of the night photography isn't bad, it's
otherwise strictly amateur hour and fifteen minutes here. The sorority
itself isn't convincing, looking too posed, too clean to be a real
sorority.
The interior of the asylum looks like an abandoned school or clinic -
no
place seen in this movie is the least bit believable. The strangest
aspect
of the direction is how the killer is directed. Early on in the movie,
we get a clear look at the killer's face. Yet for much of the remainder
of the film, his face is obscured by darkness or by being off camera.
It's
almost as if the director suddenly realized during the shoot that some
of the more popular slasher movies have had killers who were masked or
unseen.
In fact, there is a definite influence of one of those
famous slasher
movies here - Halloween. Like in that movie, the killer
here
escapes from an asylum, traveling back to a dwelling where he was in
the
past. There's even a scene where he steals a car, and creeps into a
store
to swipe something to aid in his preparation. The only difference in
that
latter scene is that here he kills the owner of the store, in a manner
so almost casual, it at least provides a few unintended chuckles in
this
sea of boredom. Having already established the quality of the nudity,
this
gives me the opportunity to discuss the movie's other supposed raison
d'être - the killings. While close reflection on the movie reveals
that the body count here is about average, the killings themselves are
so lame, and so spaced out, it seems that there are much less murders
than
there really are. The first murder doesn't happen until a third of the
movie is over, and between the next and subsequent murders, we are
treated
to endless sequences where people are surprised by people walking up
behind
them and touching their shoulders. The amount of blood is about the
equivalent
of a few squeezes from a plastic ketchup bottle - in fact, the phony
blood
looks
like
ketchup. The killer himself doesn't try to make the killings
interesting
- almost all the victims are lamely stabbed by a wimpy looking knife.
The
knife is so wimpy, you can see it has no blade as it repeatedly enters
and exits its victim in one knifing. Being mute and mostly unseen, we
have
a psycho here that is boring, though once he impressed me by
managing
to jump from the ground to a second story window. I can live with a
stupid
slasher movie, as long as it's lively and sleazy enough, but there is
absolutely
no excuse for a slasher movie that is as boring as Sorority
House
Massacre. A sequel was produced four years later, but I don't
think
that it will be any improvement, especially considering Jim Wynorski
was
the director.
UPDATE: Jim Noble sent this along:
"How ya doin'? I remember the filming of Sorority
House Massacre as if it happened a million years ago. My then best
friend and roommate, John C. Russell, was cast as "Bobby" the psychotic
slasher. John and I were trying to break into the film biz at the same
time, and I had gotten a small part on another classic... Beverly
Hills Bodysnatchers. We would, when possible, visit each others
set, and I even did something terribly STUPID and asked director Carol
Frank why Bobby was trying to kill his sister. She whispered something
into a production assistants ear and walked away: I suspect she cursed
the day I was born, but the production assistant calming explained to
me that "it's all about blood, guts, and carving up your sister."
"Sadly, my good friend John C. Russell passed away five years ago, but
somewhere he's smiling about the fact that people are actually watching
Sorority House Massacre and arguing about how bad it
is."
Check for availability on Amazon (VHS)
Check for availability on Amazon (DVD)
See also: House Of Usher, Skinner, To All A Good
Night
|