The Bang Bang Kid
(1967)
Director: Giorgio Gentili, Luciano
Lelli
Cast: Tom Bosley, Guy Madison, Riccardo Garrone
I think that most, if not all of us, have at one point
or another dreamed of being involved in the world of filmmaking.
There is the dream of making your own films, of course. But I think all
of us have also dreamed at some point of being involved in films that
have already been made. Specifically, we have dreamed of what we would
have done differently had we been involved in the filmmaking process.
For some time now, I have dreamed what I would have done if I had
edited Star Wars.
This is what I would have done at the climatic sequence: When Luke
Skywalker
is ready to fire at the target at the end of the trench, I would cut to
the earlier footage when the target was fired on before, but it was a
miss. Then I would cut to the even earlier footage when the Death
Star's main weapon was activated, and fired on Princess Leia's home
planet, destroying it. (Of course, it would seem at this point that the
rebel base planet that the X-Wing fighters took off from had been
destroyed.) Next, I would cut to the brief footage from earlier in the
climatic battle that showed Luke's sad reaction when one of his fellow
fighters had been killed in battle. Right after that, I would cut to
earlier footage of Darth Vader's spacefighter swooping into the frame
(obviously, he had just recovered from Han Solo's attack), then cockpit
footage of Vader locking in his laser sights on an X-Wing fighter from
earlier in the movie. I would then end the sequence with earlier
footage of Darth Vader firing on, and blowing up an X-Wing fighter -
though with the way the footage is put together, it would seem this
time that Luke Skywalker was being killed. Cut to the closing credits.
Another movie that I wish I could have edited is the
classic Frank Capra movie It's A Wonderful Life.
I would have kept the movie just as it is until the part where the
suicidal-thinking George Bailey gets to the bridge and looks to the
waters below. Then right before Clarence the angel appears, I would cut
to footage of Clarence falling into the water below. It's hard to make
out who is falling in the footage, so it would look like George Bailey
jumped into the water. The movie would end right there. I know that
with today's home computer technology, I could edit these movies just
like I described them and post them on YouTube, but I'm not technically
knowledgeable to do so. (If you want to do these edits and post them,
feel free to do so. All I ask is that you credit me and my web site in
the clips.) Anyway, not only am I sure that like me, you have dreamed
of changing movies, I am sure that you have dreamed of movie projects
that would mix elements of several movies together in one film. I am
sure I'm not the first person to suggest this, but I would like to
propose a project that I call Star Trek Wars.
It would begin with the Enterprise and its crew after those pesky
Klingons. During their pursuit, the Enterprise accidentally gets into a
time warp. As the crew picks themselves up after the warp, Captain Kirk
asks Spock where they are. Spock responds, "Captain, it appears to be a
long time ago... in a galaxy far away." In a short time, they join with
the Star Wars
rebels, who are battling the Imperial's new weapon, Death Star
1.5. The climatic battle with it is easy - Kirk figures out if
they move to the side of the Death Star without the planet-busting
lasers, they can bombard it with ease and stay safe.
As awful (and blasphemous) as that idea may sound to
you, even if you are not a die hard fan of Star Trek or Star Wars,
I can say with full confidence that this is not the weirdest
combination of radically different elements that there has been in the
history of film projects, both proposed and projects that were
actually
filmed. There have been plenty of times when filmmakers have thought,
"Hey, this works, and so does this. So putting them both together
should make a movie twice as good!" In fact, I have actually reviewed
at this site some movies that have combined radically different
elements. The High Crusade
combined medieval times with aliens from outer space, and so did Star
Knight - and neither of those movies worked. I'm not saying
that the combination of radically different elements never works. The classic spaghetti
western Django
had a character with a machine gun from several decades later, and that
movie worked. So when I came across the western The Bang Bang Kid,
I was willing to give it a chance, even though its combination was even
stranger-sounding than the one in Django. The
setting of The
Bang Bang Kid
is the year 1899 in the small town of Limerick, Montana. For a
long time now, the citizens of Limerick have been terrorized by "Bear"
Bullock (Madison, Adventures Of Wild
Bill Hickok),
who has bought up the town and the surrounding area, and keeps his
power thanks to his henchman "Killer" Kossock (Garrone), who kills
anyone who challenges Bullock's law. Then one day, a fellow by the name
of Merriweather
(Bosley, Happy Days) rides
into town and offers his help, having brought with him a useful gadget
he's built... a gunslinging robot.
While Django filmed
its combination of the old west and more modern machine guns with dead
seriousness, The
Bang Bang Kid
on the other hand (as you've probably guessed) takes things more
lightly, enough to be safely labeled as a comedy.
That decision to make this movie humorous was probably a good thing,
because I have a hard time picturing this premise done in a serious
manner. As it turns out, this decision to not take things seriously is
one of the few correct decisions the filmmakers made when shooting this
movie. Let me start off by examining how "The Bang Bang Kid" (the name
the robot is given) is treated throughout the movie. Some of you are
probably thinking that much of the movie is focused on the robot and
all the wacky shenanigans it causes, especially since this is an
Italian movie, which can get pretty goofy at times whether they are
intentional or unintentional comedies. But surprisingly, throughout the
movie the filmmakers seem to be trying to avoid
putting too much attention on the robot and what it can do. When it
first goes into action (after a significant amount of time has passed),
it's quickly revealed that there are still some bugs in its system and
as a result it can't finish up cleaning the town. After the bad guys
try unsuccessfully to string up the robot, it is then forgotten for
some time so that the movie can focus on subplots such as a cave-in at
a mine, and Bullock trying to sweet-talk the mayor's daughter. Then
when
the townspeople decide to lay siege on Bullock's castle (yes, a
castle), the robot does almost nothing to assist the townspeople. And
when the movie gets to its climax, the robot plays pretty much an
insignificant part.
While
I was watching the movie, I kept wondering
why the filmmakers were spending much less time on the robot than many
other things in the movie. After a while thinking about it, it finally
clicked: The
reason why they seemed to be intentionally avoiding using the robot was
because that the robot is a very boring character. He doesn't look very
much like a robot, for one thing - he's obviously a human actor dressed
completely up in western garb, and has a rubber face that looks like
its human inventor Merriweather. (And now that you know what his face
looks like, you have probably correctly guessed what happens during the
climax.) There are only a couple of brief shots of his mechanical
innards. What's worse is that nothing that this robot is seen doing in
its limited role is funny in any way, or even mildly interesting. This
isn't a character, it's just a (weak) plot device. But the robot isn't
the only character that is badly written. Take the henchman character
of "Killer" Kossock. His character stays basically in the same way
throughout the movie. Any surprises he comes across are quickly brushed
aside so he can quickly return to being a cackling murdering bully that
at times seems to be quite harsh for a movie that's supposed to be a
comedy. The central villain of the movie, "Bear" Bullock, starts off
being a hissable bad guy, but halfway through his character takes a
bizarre turn that forces the audience to not only see him in another
way, but see him get written out of the movie without punishment. As
for Merriweather the inventor, he's not only not given a proper
introduction (almost right after he's first seen, he's showing off his
robot), but at times he's surprisingly dim-witted for someone who could
construct a complex mechanical creature.
I don't blame any of the actors for these particular shortcomings, nor
for any of the other faults the movie has. It's clear by the
expressions on their faces (especially with Bosley) that the actors
don't seem to be very enthusiastic about being in this project. They
also have the humiliation of being so poorly dubbed that their dialogue
sounds like it was recorded in an echo chamber. The fact that even a
second director on set couldn't build the cast's energy is just part of
the movie's generally poor direction. That aforementioned siege at the
castle comes across as extremely flat, for one thing, and both
directors simply don't know at times when to quit hammering an
attempted gag into the audience. However, all this bad stuff about the
movie that I've illustrated in the past two paragraphs is nothing
compared to what the main fault of The Bang Bang Kid
is: IT ISN'T FUNNY. There are no laughs, no giggles, not even any
moments that might make you smile. I can't even imagine little kids
(the audience the movie seems to be aiming at frequently) will be
amused. A typical gag of the movie has the narrator telling us that
Bullock thinks of himself as "some kind of a king," and all of a sudden
the movie cuts from a shot of Bullock in western garb to Bullock
wearing a crown and a robe, and then shows the townspeople wearing
medieval peasant outfits for the rest of the scene. Is this supposed to
be funny? Believe it or not, there are gags in the movie that are even
worse than that one. It's incredible to conclude that everyone involved
in the creative process of this movie had no sense of comedy or even
basic storytelling. The only useful function this movie has is to
illustrate the slow progress of the comic spaghetti western had before
movies like They
Call Me Trinity came along.
UPDATE: Mike
Mueller sent in this information:
"I could endure just 20
minutes of Bang Bang Kid
before tossing it back in the rental pool, so am only familiar with the
title thru the memoirs of its producer, Sid Pink (So You Want To Make Movies, 1989).
"BBK indirectly came about when
Pink struck an insane deal with the 60's TV syndicate, Westinghouse, to
produce 36 pictues for its stations in 5 years, (He anaged to
deliver 19 timekillers in 2 years before balking over the usual
creative differences.)
"You wrote that BBK was
directed by 'two Italians', Georgio Gentilli and Luciano Leli.
The film was actually helmed by Stanley Praeger, an American theatrical
director also involved with the cult 60's tv show, Car 54,
Where Are You?
Gentilli was likely the AD, and Leli was paid for the use of his
name. Euro co-productions required quotas of both actors and
technicians from each participating nation to qualify for government
subsidies. (It was common in the 60's to see TV Guide list cheap
films with several countries of origin.) Although a certain
number of each nationality was represented, countries also demanded the
presence of a US actor, howeveer faded. Tom Bosley must have been
hard up for work, because the producer was surprised when he readily
accepted the initial fee.
"After the film wrapped a week ahead of schedule, the editor soon
discovered why - he could only assemble 67 minutes of usable footage.
Hence, the added filler about the five hired killers, plus the medieval
malarkey.
"Born pitchman Pink claimed Bang Bang
was "a love story loosely based on Taming
Of The Shrew(!), and the unreliable robot was intende to
generate yocks. I suspect the story really originated with a Twilight
Zone episode, wherein Lee Marvin
managed a malfunctioning robot fighter. The finale is
suspiciously familiar."
Check
for availability on Amazon (VHS)
Check
for availability on Amazon (DVD)
See also: Death Machine, Evil Roy Slade, Rustlers'
Rhapsody
|