Timebomb
(1991)
Director: Avi
Nesher
Cast: Michael Biehn, Patsy Kensit, Tracey Scoggins
Timebomb spent some time on the
distributor's shelf, and
didn't spend much time in theaters during its small release. But this
Dino
De Laurentiis production isn't as bad as you may think. Not that it's
without
its problems - the movie has a number of unanswered questions and
becomes
more dubious as it goes along. On the other hand, it's never boring,
and
it does deliver in the action department. Who knows, you might find it
more than an okay way to spend the time during a dull weekend.
Michael Biehn plays Eddie, a quiet and soft-spoken watch
repairer who
lives in Los Angeles. He lives such a boring life, that the most
exciting
thing he does is drink a glass of milk while he eats a salad. One
night,
before he's about to ride his bike back home, a city gas leak ignites
and
sets a building on fire. Without hesitation or a realization of the
risk
at hand, Eddie races into the burning building and saves a woman and a
baby. His heroic act gets noticed, and later that night the incident is
reported on TV. When the news report is on, a man watching elsewhere in
the city notices the hero. He recognizes the man - a man who is
supposed
to be dead.
The mysterious man makes a telephone call. Later that
night, while Eddie
sleeps in his apartment, a man dressed in black (who is played by Billy
Blanks, a B-movie martial arts star of some prominence) breaks in and
tries
to kill him. Eddie awakens in the nick of time and to his own surprise
he manages to fight off this professional killer and drive him away.
Despite
Eddie's insistence, the police write off the entire incident as a
burglary
gone wrong. Later, a group of mysterious people attempt a hit and run
on
Eddie as he rides his bicycle, but Eddie survives the incident. These
events
then seem to be the trigger for bizarre flashbacks Eddie starts to
experience.
Remembering that a client of his is a psychiatric doctor, he goes to
her
and they agree to have him exchange work on her watch in return for her
examination of his flashbacks...little realizing what this will lead
to,
or of the dangers that are still out there for Eddie.
A good beginning, I agree. We have a sympathetic central
character,
and though this plot is a reworking of the standard amnesia situation,
we are still interested because we want to know not only who these
mysterious
people are, but we want to know why they are interested in Eddie and
why
they want to kill him. Our sympathy for Eddie, unfortunately, starts to
wane shortly after this point in the movie. Without spoiling things,
I'll
just say that Eddie's character does such a bizarre turn in his
personality
that he pretty much turns into another character - you'll be mystified
why a kind, frightened young man turns into a yelling, gun toting
avenger
in what seems like a matter of hours. And his behavior towards his
doctor
is at times so cruel, viewers may develop an extreme dislike to him.
Nor
is his rational for getting his doctor to stick with him all throughout
the rest of the movie. I couldn't help but think of a movie I saw
several
years ago called Suspect Device, with C. Thomas Howell,
which
had a central plot quite similar to this. The difference there was that
Howell's character stayed pretty much at a constant despite the
revelations
he learned. Also, his actions were those of a clearly desperate man who
had no other choice, not like Eddie who seems sometimes to be mean for
the sake of being mean.
The plot of the movie also becomes more improbable as
the movie runs,
which lead me to ask myself a lot of questions, including: (1) Why
spend
the time and money to film a few minutes in the middle of the movie in
Mexico if it doesn't add anything to the story, (2) Would the military
really abandon a large military laboratory and its multi-million dollar
equipment and have it guarded by only one guard, (3) Why would
the
electricity still be running in this abandoned complex, (4) Would this
machinery really work perfectly after more than twenty years, and (5)
Would
you, encountering such mammoth equipment, immediately start punching
buttons
at random? Characters are also ill-defined and handled poorly; a
wounded
female villain's fate is never resolved after she's left in a hotel
room,
and a separate group of characters lead by Robert Culp disappear before
the end, with no mention of their fate or what they really wanted of
Eddie.
Avi Nesher strikes me as a director who is only as good
as his script,
and of how much visual "pow" he can put in his movie. Take his later
movie
The
Mercenary, which was a good action movie but was definitely
stronger on the action and visuals than the story. As in that movie,
the
action scenes here are above average. The hand-to-hand fight in the
apartment,
and shoot-outs in a psychiatric ward and a porn theater are crisply
directed
and edited to maximum impact. Nesher also shows his visual flair
elsewhere
in the movie, most prominently in the flashback sequences where he uses
simple but effective tricks like shooting in all-white rooms with
actors
wearing white clothing. Actually, this may have been more for budgetary
reasons (it's apparent on several occasions that Nesher was not working
with a completely adequate budget), but it does manage to still be
interesting
to look at. No doubt some viewers will find most interesting to look at
are the strong sexual elements occasionally flashed on the screen,
though
I found this stuff to alternately be either steamy or laughable and out
of place. The movie itself is neither especially good or terrible,
though
it will certainly keep your interest.
Check for availability on Amazon (VHS)
Check
for availability on Amazon (DVD)
See also: The Mercenary, Sabotage, The Ambassador
|