Blind Fury
(1989)
Director: Phillip
Noyce
Cast: Rutger Hauer, Terry O'Quinn, Brandon Call, Nick Cassavettes
Special guest review!
By Jason Alt
If nothing else can be
said of this movie, (which still airs regularly on cable), it can at
least be said that it is not unoriginal. The notion of a hero whose
blindness leads to a sharpening of his other senses has been done before, though
not overdone. Most of us will remember the amazing superhero Daredevil
from Marvel comics. Daredevil's blindness accounts for his amazing
hearing abilities, which he uses to battle evil and do really
terrifying stunts atop city buildings. This actually bothers me quite a
bit for several reasons. Firstly, why are there always so many
flag-poles embedded in the side of skyscrapers at about the 50th
floor? Who flies a flag that no one can see? Secondly, allowing that
these flag-poles exist, how does Daredevil know where they are so he
can get at them with his little rope-thingy that he has? Do they make
noise? Does he smell them? He can’t see them - yet he fearlessly
back-flips off buildings and lassos them as he falls. This strikes me
as a little bit foolhardy. So the concept is not totally original
either, but on the same token it isn’t worn out like some other
concepts (can anyone say "reality television"?)
Rutger Hauer plays
Nick Parker, the protagonist in Blind Fury, a movie
about a man who is blinded in the Vietnam War, and rescued by friendly
villagers. These particular villagers are well trained in the art of
the katana, putting on wonderful demonstrations for the women and
children of the village (who have seen it everyday as long as they have
been alive, yet OOOH and AAAH every time someone does it.) This
‘demonstration’ begins with someone holding a sword. First he yells
something in a crazy language (probably the word ‘pull’) and someone
throws a melon over his head. Then the person with the sword makes two
quick chops in the air before the melon lands in the hands of someone
across the room. The melon splits a little bit and we see that it has
been cut into 4 perfect quarters. Just to be assholes, and amuse
themselves at the expense of someone else’s misfortune, they give the
recently blinded Nick the sword and throw the melon in front of his
face. After that they laugh like fiends when he either doesn’t even
swing, or he misses, or the melon hits him in the head. It really is
infuriating from a humanitarian standpoint (or you could just laugh
along with them like I did.)
Over time, a
nameless villager is teaching Nick to use the sword. He is taught Katas
(which are choreographed demonstration patterns which have to be
memorized), and he is taught to
listen for the melon. He teaches Nick this technique by hanging a melon
on a string and bouncing it off his face until he moves, or anticipates
it a little bit. He also laughs at him some more. Soon it is time for
him to try the melon trick on his own. By now he has grown a beard.
This is so the audience understands that time has passed ("I thought he
had mastered the katana in one afternoon of being hit with a melon; I
guess not because he has a beard now.") This is one of the many
examples where this movie shows that the producers think we are all
idiots. Any time they can show an audience common Cupric sulfate
crystals and expect us to accept that it is a secret formula that an
organic chemist has been working on for months you have to assume they
take us all for buffoons. Which isn’t that far off base; instead of
going out and getting a job I am here at home watching a blind guy cut
the hands off of corrupt cops. Getting back to the melon trick, one has
to assume he finally does it. It wouldn’t be much of a movie if he got
shot 10 minutes later and with his dying breath gasped "I should have
learned to cut up that guava before I left the village, huh?" So he
cuts it up, and all the villagers are very impressed. At this point you
have probably seen the best part of the whole movie, but keep watching
anyway.
The problem with
being a blind Vietnam vet/ninja is that everyone seems to want to kill
you. Nick is on his way to go visit his old war buddy Frank Deveraux.
He hasn’t seen him in 20 years, and the movie goes through no great
lengths to explain why he waited this long to tender a visit, or what
he has been doing in the 20 years since we last saw him last. This
Frank Deveraux is the same Frank that we see running away from the
ambush that left Nick blind in the beginning of the film. Nick has
apparently forgiven him for this, but must not have talked with him in
20 years. When he gets to the house he learns that Frank is living in
Vegas and his wife (the voluptuous Meg Foster) is taking care of their
son Billy (the sickeningly cute Brandon Call.) Frank owes some very bad
people a lot of money, and Nick ends up having to trek across the
country to save his buddy. He also ends up having to drag along his
initially bratty son and battling hordes of cops on the take, redneck
thugs, and a Japanese ninja.
The action shots in
this movie are terrific to say the least. There is a lot of silence
with the main character creeping around and bad guys trying to hide
even though they are breathing like Lamaze graduates. They are very tense, and
the sound effects are designed to scare people s**tless after 25
seconds of complete silence. Under real conditions a sword whooshing
through the air would make little sound at all. In these scenes,
however, it sounds like a Concorde landing in your backyard. Very
exciting stuff. People get stuff cut off of them a lot, too. It is kind
of gratuitous even though there is little blood in this movie. I was
actually a little surprised at the lack of blood in this film. Had I
directed this film, there would be buckets of blood everywhere for no
reason. The director of this movie however decided it would be more
believable if someone who had gotten his hand sliced off would stagger
away holding a stump that isn’t even oozing. I began to resent this
after awhile; it’s not as if these people are being cut with
light-sabers. The lack of blood however adds more to the credibility of
this film; it’s not an excuse to show piles of blood-spattered corpses
(even though piles of blood-spattered corpses are cool.)
He doesn’t take any
crap either. The whole movie is peppered with people trying to play
tricks on him because he is blind. People douse his food with hot
sauce, tell him that rocks are candy, try to steal his poker chips, and
are generally assholes. I don’t know if there are people out there who
will actually do this to blind people, but if there are they should be
shot. He doesn’t take abuse though. He has a very Chaplin-esque way of
smacking people with his sword (which is one of those swords where the
hilt and scabbard are one solid piece of wood so it looks like a
walking stick, but can be pulled apart to reveal the blade,) and making
it look like genuine clumsiness. It is actually quite amusing to see
someone who can see in real life lampooning around so convincingly.
The movie is also
jam-packed with s**t jokes. I swear about half of the dialogue writers
from this move must have gone on to profitable careers writing for
The Bernie Mac Show.
Stupid japes like "Makes me want to see if I can get my license
renewed," after a scene where the protagonist drives the wrong way down
a crowded city street and stops 3 millimeters short of a wall make me
want to groan aloud. And groan aloud I did. After a particularly cheesy
joke, my parents came in the room and asked what I was watching. With
all that groaning they must have thought it was a porno. Far from it;
there isn’t as much as one bare nipple in the whole film. I was a
little surprised. I have said it before, and I’ll say it again, no
matter how bad a movie is, it can be at least partially redeemed by
some boobs. At least that’s one man’s opinion.
I like it when
people get their hands cut off. Who doesn’t? It looks cool if the
film-makers can do a convincing job of it, and it is widely maintained
that I am a sick bastard. There is a lot of that in this film as well
as a lot of close calls. When the protagonist can’t see, he uses sonar.
So he generally chops in the direction of noises he has heard, hoping
to hit someone. Usually he cuts someone and messes their s**t up, but
other times he will cut the end off a cigar, or cut their shirt open
(he only does this to men, sadly.) This is a lot of fun to watch, and
it is completely hilarious in an unrealistic sort of way.
Overall Rutger
Hauer does a convincing job as someone who has been blind for some
time, but has not been blind from birth. And Brandon Call does a very
good job as the sickeningly cute Billy. He does all the stereotypical
movie-kid stuff like crying at the end and yelling “I wanna go with
Uncle/Aunt (fill in the blank)!” This movie manages to chronicle the
progression of a love/hate relationship to one of love and mutual
respect (just like every other movie ever made.) I liked the
movie, and if you like a mixture of violence and an actual plot, this
movie will tickle your fancy. Just don’t watch it around family; the
groaning will make them suspicious.
UPDATE: I got this letter from
"J. Fury":
"Howdy. Just read [Jason's] review
of Blind Fury and mostly enjoyed it (I think I may have liked
the film a hair or two better than [he] did). There was an element of
the movie's background that you never mentioned, so I thought I'd pull
your coat: The character Rutger Hauer plays in the film is an
Americanized version of a popular Japanese film character called
Zatoichi, much the same as Yojimbo being the basis for Clint Eastwood's
"Man with No Name". "Ichi", as he's sometimes called, was the hero of
one or two dozen films starting back in the early 1960s. Though blind,
he was far and away one of the best swordsmen around, and many of his
fight scenes were played for laughs as he bested his foes while
pretending to be helpless. This trait and the character's gently
mocking , sometimes self-deprecating sense of humor, were among the
elements that the makers of Blind Fury hoped to copy for
American audiences. Alas, the film didn't spawn a single sequel, unlike
its Japanese progenitor. As it happens, though, there are a couple of
other touchstones that connect to the Zatoichi films:
"1) One of the films that pops up late in the series is, yes Zatoichi
Meets
Yojimbo! A decade or so after the introduction of each, Japanese
audiences finally got to see two of their favorite characters face off
in the same movie. In terms of its Hoped-For Effect, think of a less
one-sided version of the buzz surrounding the recently back-burnered
Superman vs. Batman film. Unfortunately, the movie's Actual Effect
was a lot more like King Kong vs. Godzilla. Fans of both
swordsmen found the movie a huge disappointment and many consider it to
be the worst movie either character ever appeared in. Oh, well...
"2) In [the] intro, [he] mentioned Marvel Comics' Daredevil. Even I'm
not geek enough to go into a lengthy description of how DD knows where
those improbably placed flagpoles are. Since the explanation for same
appears in Every Damn Issue, I'll just figure you were joking. But
here's an amusing nugget: In an issue released some time during the
early '80s, DD's alter ego, blind lawyer Matt Murdock goes on a
business trip to Japan He is set upon by muggers who figure that a
blind man will make for an easy target. Matt's heightened senses, of
course, allow him to beat the living crap out of the thugs, who cringe
in fear and run away from him screaming "Zatoichi! Zatoichi!" Blind
fury indeed...
And I got this letter from W. David
Pattison:
"As I am sure you will be notified
by countless other comic book nerds, Daredevil's enhanced senses do not
result from his blindness. His blindness and his enhanced senses
resulted from exposure to mutagenic chemicals, which also granted him a
"radar sense" which, combined with his superhumanly acute senses of
smell, taste, touch, and hearing, allow him to perceive his environment
far better than a sighted person.
"I do not wish to be insulting, but if one wishes to criticize a
character and how he and his abilities are portrayed, it would help if
one were actually familiar with the character and his comic book, which
Mr. Alt obviously isn't. Again, I do not wish to be insulting, but it
makes it rather difficult to take a critic seriously when he makes a
criticism based on only the most superficial familiarity with a
subject. Of course, he was actually critiquing Blind Fury, and
the whole Daredevil thing was just a marginally related intro section
to the main review. Still, it was just jarring.
"Thank you for taking the time to read the ranting of a comic book
geek."
Check for availability on Amazon (VHS)
Check for availability on Amazon (DVD)
See also: Mafia Vs. Ninja,
Omega Doom, Sword
Of Honor
|