The Dark
(a.k.a. The Mutilator)
(1979)
Director: John (Bud)
Cardos
Cast: Cathy Lee Crosby, William Devane, Richard Jaeckel
The Daaaaaarkkkk....
The Dark is a 70s made-for-TV movie in
disguise as a theatrical
movie. It's interesting to use this movie as an example as to how movie
going tastes have changed. If it were made today, there's no doubt that
it would been made for video or TV - if it was lucky. But I doubt that
even audiences in 1979 would have found anything of real interest here.
Neither the horror or science fiction angle has been exploited enough
to
be considered effort, and the movie isn't scary or fascinating in any
way.
I think the most positive aspect of the movie is that it shows that the
demands of audiences nowadays have increased, making it harder to make
and market movies like this.
The Daaaaaarkkkk....
The movie was made by FVI (like Manson Pictures, they
were a poor man's
Crown International Pictures during the 70s), which might explain why a
TV station in the movie has the call letters KFVI. That's the best wit
in the movie, which is sorely lacking even bad attempts at
wit.
The
Dark is so earnest and so serious, it becomes boring. Didn't
anyone
- the director, the screenwriter, or even the actors - see any
amusement
in the plot premise, being about a serial killing alien who decapitates
people with laser beams from his eyes? I guess not; maybe producer Dick
Clark thought that the casting of Devane, Jaeckel, and Crosby (that's
incredible!)
would be good enough. (The cast also includes Casey Casem, Philip
Michael
Thomas, and Keenan Wynn, all of whom have seen better days.)
The Daaaaaarkkkk....
L.A. is hit by another kind of night stalker, who likes
to mutilate
his victims before the aforementioned decapitations. The first victim
is
the daughter of Steve (Devane, who here has a striking resemblance to
comedian
Richard Belzer), a burned out author who was previously a disgraced
cop.
He decides to do something about it after recovering amazingly quickly
from her death - this consists of driving around L.A., occasionally
stopping
to take a look at one of the three or four murder scenes (learning
nothing)
and/or to piss policeman Mooney (Jaeckel) off, who hates his guts for
reasons
never really specified. Meanwhile, TV reporter Zoe Owens (Crosby) is
doing
her own investigation on "The Mangler", as the killer has been dubbed
by
the press. This investigation consists of pretty much doing nothing
except
arguing with her boss Sherman (Wynn) about the responsibility of the
press.
It's odd to actually see a responsible TV station manager in a movie,
though
why he feels responsible and what his definition of "responsible" is is
never brought up. In fact, his character only seems to be there so
there
can be a supposedly scary sequence where he is walking in a parking
garage
and all the lights start to go out.
The Daaaaaarkkkk....
It's amazing that almost nothing ever happens in
this movie.
Oh, after about a third of the movie, Zoe and Steve eventually meet.
But
the screenplay can't even make itself develop their relationship into
friendship,
love, or strong feelings to each other. Eventually they do exchange
some
kisses, and I was struck by how unsexy both the scene and the actors
were.
They spend most of the rest of the movie doing pretty much what they
were
doing before (except doing it together this time.) So it's
more
of the same ho-hum and murky night photography, with only the
occasional
diversion such as Casey Casem's cameo as a police coroner who makes a
speech
about epidermis and then makes the brilliant deduction that the killer
has immense strength.
The Daaaaaarkkkk....
The movie would have never ended if the duo hadn't
encountered a convenient
psychic, who informs them that the killer is an alien and is killing to
gain strength. Considering that this alien is physically mutilating
bodies
and shooting laser beams from his eyes, it would seem that his killing
actually make him lose strength - but what the hell, we can't
expect
aliens to evolve like humans. The psychic also conveniently gives clues
to who the next victim will be, leading the duo to catch the alien in
the
act. The alien then gets into a battle with what seems like half of the
L.A.P.D., which is kind of a fun sequence but doesn't justify slogging
through the previous 90 minutes or so. The alien is then killed, and
the
movie ends seconds afterwards - leaving unanswered questions like how
did
this alien from L.A. actually get to L.A., where it hid in the daytime,
and why it could previously smash a cement pillar with one blow and
shove
aside a van, but then later taking three swats to smash down a wooden
door.
That's about all that the movie left me to think about (making me glad
that I take down notes when watching a movie to be reviewed), because
there
was almost nothing else that stuck in my mind afterwards. Except for
the
cheesy device of using two certain words whispered on the soundtrack
endlessly
during a typical empty moment - notice even I had to use those
two
words to write a long enough review for this empty movie.
UPDATE: Here is some interesting information
about the movie and FVI, provided by reader William Norton:
"The Dark isn't a TV film sold to FVI, it was
actually shot
in Panavision and opened wide in Los Angeles and the producers were
really
trying to get a big release on this flick. Tobe Hooper was
supposed
to direct it, but couldn't get along with the producers, so he was
replaced
in day one. It DOES look like a TV film, for viewing then, and
viewing
now, it does NOT deserve a R rating at all! There is absolutley NOTHING
in the film to warrant one! (maybe it wasn't R. Montoro released Search
And Destroy, a 1978 Canadian film with Perry King and George
Kennedy,
and it was rated PG, as it played on Showtime and HBO in the
afternoons,
yet when it played here in Seattle as Striking Back, the poster
had a "tacked on" sticker with a R rating!)
"The film opened very wide in California, but FVI
gave up after the
poor box-office and gave a drive-in release in Seattle and many
cities.
Film couldn't be cheap either, William Devane asking fee on First
Blood
in 1981 was 250,000 as a replacement for Kirk Douglas, which in turn he
got replaced by Richard Crenna (they paid him, even though they didn't
use him in the film). Devane must have gotten a good 175,000 on
this
film, which is very outrageous. Devane was also the first actor
to
get a million dollar contract on TV show also.
"Alien Predator isn't FVI, it's Trans World,
and produced
by owners of Trans World the Saluis. I forgot the film companies
name at the time, but it wasn't FVI. They produced it under their film
company that made Monster Dog, Can't Shake The Beat,
and
others before creating Trans World Video. Sarui's and partner later
split
and the partners created Imperial Video, and produced Van Damme films.
"FVI went bankrupt in 1982 because Universal filed a
lawsuit against
the 1981 Jaws rip-off Great White, and Edward L. Montoro
released
650 prints of that film and spend major money in advertisement. FVI was
in trouble, and Montoro felt it was time to go, so he took out 1
million
dollars out of the company's funds, and disappeared, never to be seen
again.
"The company filed Chapter 11 and stopped running the
company.
Several filmmakers complained that they were ripped off and never got
paid
the movies they sold to FVI and FVI couldn't pay anyone and didn't
release
anything. They changed their name breifly,to Artist releasing or
something
like that, released Vigilante, Incubus to the theatres,
and
also sat on, and release films like The Act, straight to video.
FVI was sold to some small time operation in 1987, who picked up
several
South African action films to women wrestling shows called GLOW.
FVI officially disappeared in 1990, I think."
(Note: In my review, I was trying to give the idea that
though The
Dark was made for theaters, the look, feel, and unscary
"horror"
of the movie made it look exactly like a TV movie from the period.
Before
seeing the movie, I knew it was made for theaters - I had seen
the
movie poster for it, and read a review of it in a back issue of Variety
magazine.
The reviewer at the time was sure it would "scare up some box office
coin",
but complained that the alien looked "like a werewolf in jeans.")
UPDATE 2: "Sandra" gave
me the following
information:
"Hi. I just discovered your site. I bet
you don't know
that there was a 'novelization' of the screenplay for The Dark,
published in paperback. In the book, the killer was not an Alien,
but a zombie who had been a cannibal-killer back in the the 19th
Century.
Hence the grey skin. He (or it) decapitated people with a machete
or something. There were no laser beams, no victims bursting into
flames. The whole thing read like a script for the Night
Stalker
tv series. My guess is that the half-assed Alien angle was added
by the producers after the film was made, trying to capitalize on the
popularity
of sf films. Too bad, because (while still pretty bad) the
original
was a lot better than what they wound up doing to it."
Interesting. Novelizations can be very interesting,
because they frequently
contain scenes that don't appear in the final cut of the movie.
Sometimes
scenes are completely different - the novelization for Die Hard
With
A Vengeance contained the movie's originally filmed ending,
which
was hastily reshot just before the theatrical release. However, this is
the first time I've heard of a novelization with a central theme being
completely different than the finished film. I did learn not long after
writing the review that the original director of The Dark
(Tobe Hooper) was replaced during filming. Perhaps the script was
rewritten
during this transition, and the writer of the novelization had already
finished his book, and FVI was too cheap to have the book rewritten.
UPDATE 3: Todd Jaeger sent this in:
"To elaborate a little bit on what "Sandra" told you
about the 1979 film The Dark ...
"I have the paperback novelization (a first printing
from June 1978) by Max Franklin. It's a Signet Paperback, ISBN #
0-451-08242-7. The novel is only 187 pages long, but it's still a
very interesting read. It also contains 8 pages of photos from
the film. The film might have been a lot more interesting if they had
stuck with the original zombie angle, considering the obvious human
appearance of the creature. According to the SF, Horror and
Fantasy Film Review (the link is #4 on the external reviews on IMDb),
the film already was done with the zombie storyline and was re-edited
after poor screenings, freezing the frame and adding the laser
opticals. I for one would love to have seen the new DVD
release from Media Blasters to have included the original version if it
still exists. To see how one film can turn out so differently (as
Brazil was so tampered with) would be fascinating even if the original
version of The Dark were still bad. The DVD contains a
commentary by the director and "fan" Scott Spiegel (Evil Dead 2).
I haven't listened to this commentary yet, but it might shed some more
light on the whole situation!
"If you run across a copy of the paperback someday, give it a read,
it's
worth it. Thought you might like to know! I enjoy reading your
comments on the site, keep up the great work!"
Check for availability on Amazon (DVD)
See also: Mutant, Rituals, Curse Of The
Cannibal Confederates
|